
This Supergirl movie critique from Scene N Nerd Podcast dives deep into the 2026 film's significant disappointments. Hosts find the script watered down, source material gutted, and a creative disconnect throughout, arguing the cast deserved better.
Key Takeaways
- The Supergirl movie is criticized for a watered-down script and a significant departure from its source material, leading to a generic narrative.
- Directors' choices and potential script alterations are questioned, with suggestions that the director may have been imitating James Gunn poorly.
- Jason Momoa's portrayal of Lobo lacked substance, with the hosts recommending the show 'Krypton' for a superior live-action version.
- Thematic inconsistencies and underdeveloped character arcs, such as Supergirl's decision to kill the antagonist, detract from the film's overall message.
- Despite not directly directing, James Gunn, as head producer, holds responsibility for the final creative decisions and the film's shortcomings.
- The film is seen as a disservice to its cast, particularly Millie Alcock, who were not provided with adequate material to shine.
- Ultimately, the movie lacked fun and engagement, failing even as a basic popcorn flick due to a pervasive creative disconnect.
On this episode of the Scene N Nerd Podcast, we dive deep into the highly anticipated Supergirl film, but our excitement quickly turned to disappointment. Sarah and Will, eager to embrace the latest DC offering, found themselves critiquing a project that felt fundamentally flawed from its core.
A Major Misfire: Dissecting the Supergirl Film's Failures
From the outset, it was clear this Supergirl movie was more than just a minor stumble; it was a significant misfire. We felt a palpable disconnect in nearly every frame, a feeling that the creative vision was fractured. The script, which we believe was heavily watered down from its original intent, seemed to gut the rich source material it was based on. Ultimately, we felt Milly Alcock and the entire cast deserved a much stronger foundation to showcase their talents. Even the portrayal of Jason Momoa's Lobo was underwhelming, appearing more like the actor in costume than a distinct character.
Questions Surrounding Creative Choices
The discussion delves into the perplexing creative decisions behind the film. We question the extent to which Anna Nguiria's original screenplay survived the production process, especially considering director Claire Galepczy's known tendency for significant script alterations. Furthermore, we explore whether Galepczy was the right fit for this project, with some suggesting a poor imitation of James Gunn's directorial style.
Adaptation Woes and Narrative Weaknesses
A central theme of our critique is the film's deviation from its source material. Many crucial elements appear to have been altered or omitted, resulting in a narrative that felt “dumbed down” and generic. Even viewers unfamiliar with the comics could sense the story's lack of depth. The pacing and narrative structure also came under fire, with the opening failing to adequately engage the audience. We posited that a stronger introduction, perhaps delving deeper into Supergirl's Argo origins, could have provided essential context for her character and motivations.
Lobo, Villains, and Thematic Inconsistencies
The portrayal of Jason Momoa's Lobo is singled out for its lack of characterization beyond the actor's established persona. For a superior live-action take on the character and a more compelling Superman-related narrative, we recommend checking out the show Krypton. Beyond Lobo, we examine the film's thematic inconsistencies. Supergirl's decision to kill her antagonist was seen as a jarring departure from her established character arc and potentially undermined themes of grief and trauma. The introduction of human trafficking as a plot point also felt like a tired cliché that failed to resonate effectively.
We also touched on the fundamental role of a villain in a superhero story: their ability to mirror or challenge the hero. The Lobo character, as presented, failed to offer this crucial connection to Supergirl or other characters, weakening the overall narrative. The exploration of race annihilation, a potentially powerful theme, was also a missed opportunity for deeper character development and thematic resonance.
Responsibility and The Road Ahead for the DCU
While James Gunn may not have been directly involved in writing or directing, we argue that as the head producer, the ultimate responsibility for the film's creative direction rests with him. This mirrors the accountability expected of figures like Kevin Feige in the MCU, where “the buck stops with the balls.”
Overall Sentiment: A Lack of Enjoyment
The overwhelming sentiment from our discussion is a profound lack of enjoyment and engagement with the Supergirl movie. It was described as “blah,” failing even to qualify as a true “popcorn movie” due to its absence of fun. While acknowledging that worse films exist, this particular outing felt like a significant letdown.
A Disservice to Talent
Ultimately, we believe the film did a profound disservice to Milly Alcock and the entire cast. They were not provided with adequate material or direction to succeed, and the poorly executed final product hampered their performances. We break down where it all went wrong and discuss whether James Gunn's DCU can course-correct from this disappointing start.
Want to keep the conversation going? Hit us up on X (formerly Twitter) @SceneNNerd, Bluesky @SceneNNerd.bsky.social, Facebook, Instagram @scene_n_nerd, and Threads @scene_n_nerd. Don't forget to check out our website at www.scenennerdpodcast.com. If you enjoyed this episode, drop us a rating and a shout-out on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast fix!
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the Supergirl movie disappointing?
The hosts found the Supergirl movie disappointing due to a watered-down script, gutted source material, and a general creative disconnect in every frame, feeling the cast deserved better.
How did the Supergirl movie adapt its source material?
The film is heavily criticized for significantly altering or omitting crucial elements from its source material, resulting in a "dumbing down" of the narrative and a loss of creative potential.
Was Jason Momoa's Lobo portrayal effective in the Supergirl movie?
Jason Momoa's Lobo was described as simply looking like 'Jason Momoa in makeup,' lacking distinct characterization. The hosts suggest watching the show 'Krypton' for a better portrayal.
Who is responsible for the creative decisions behind the Supergirl movie?
While not directly writing or directing, hosts argue that James Gunn, as the head producer, holds ultimate responsibility for the film's creative outcomes, stating 'the buck stops with the balls.'
Did the Supergirl movie do a disservice to its actors?
Yes, the hosts strongly felt that Millie Alcock and the entire cast were done a disservice by the film's poor execution, lacking adequate material and direction to succeed.
Meta (0:00): Introducing America's Workforce Academy built by Meta. Paid training, a job, and a path to America's future because the future is for everyone. Learn more at meta.com/america's workforce academy.
Speaker 1 (0:22): That brings us to Supergirl. We both watch Supergirl. Cara Zurel, aka Supergirl, joins forces with an unlikely companion on an interstellar journey of vengeance and justice when an unexpected adversary strikes too close to home. This is written by Anna Nguiria and directed by Claire Galepczy. This was written by a woman?
Unknown Speaker (0:51): It was her yeah. Yeah. It was her second Anna, it was only her second writing credit. She's got, yeah, she's got three coming now. She's got, she's doing she's apparently gonna be writing the new Wonder Woman movie, and also, Teen Titans.
Unknown Speaker (1:09): And she's got one other non DC related, credit, I believe, as far as in in development. But prior to this, she's had only written, I think, a short film, prior to this. So this was only her second outing as a screenwriter. Yeah. I I wonder
Speaker 1 (1:25): I wonder how much of her script actually made it to camera because we know the directors like to cut things and change things.
Unknown Speaker (1:33): Yeah. So Yeah. Yeah. Cliff Gillespie. Yeah.
Unknown Speaker (1:36): He and he directed things like I, Tonya, and, know, he's he's not you know, he's had he's had some pretty, solid films in in the past, but yeah.
Speaker 1 (1:49): Well That's great. I just don't think he should have directed this movie.
Unknown Speaker (1:53): Yeah. Well, I'm thinking he was just trying to do a poor imitation of James Gunn.
Speaker 1 (1:58): Well and my my issue isn't even that. Like, I've seen poor imitation imitation of James Gunn. That's fine. My my issue is this should have been directed by a woman. I mean, you look at all of the superhero movies that have starred a female character, they are the ones that do well are directed by women.
Speaker 1 (2:24): I originally thought this was probably written by a man, But but to know that it was written by a female, it makes me question how much of her actual screenplay made it to there, how familiar she was with the source material, because I've heard people who have read the source material. And this could have gone very differently. And somebody, I don't know who, watered it the fuck down, and it pisses me off. It pisses me off to no end.
Speaker 2 (3:03): Yeah. I mean, I did read an article. I did read where she talked about adapting the source material, and she did some choices that she made as far as, you know, one of the big ones was, I think, you know, she she left a couple things out, of course, changing the motivations for Crem, you know, and, you know, that was that was one of them. But also, I think to your point, as far as the there were so many I really wanted to like this movie. And I know I went back and the more distance I get from it, what I remember of it, it's just that there's a sense of disappointment, like you said.
Unknown Speaker (3:49): Because I feel like and apparently, you know, I think they whenever it went into the editing bay, there were a lot of choices that were made that, for example, the way it just started to me was just out of the gate. I just and I haven't read the source material either. So I haven't read Woman of Mark. Even even though they did give us me this this nice comic book at the at the movie theater where where I where I went to go see it. But, but that being said, it just it just got me off on the wrong foot where I just I didn't feel engaged with this character.
Speaker 2 (4:33): And and and I wish they had started with the Argo stuff first, quite honestly. Because whenever that or or have more of that because whenever I got about you know, when we did get more about her backstory and learning about what happened, you know, happened on Argo and and all that and her and her relationship with her with Carl's parents and stuff. I I I you know, those scenes and the scenes that she had with with Clark, really, I felt like, okay. I'm connecting with this person in in a way that I under you know, I understand where they're coming from. And it would have, like, provided me better, I guess, context for, like, why she is sort of the quote, unquote hot mess that she is that we when we first meet her at the end of Superman, but also why she's doing the things, going off planet, finding trying to fly places, the red suns.
Speaker 2 (5:39): You know? And, again, maybe, you know, and maybe that's where if I had read the source material, I don't know if it would've helped me or even maybe even more mad or more disappointed in that the story that they could've told.
Speaker 1 (5:50): Yeah. Obviously, I watched Kinda Funny's review. Greg Miller has read the source material. Nick has also read the source material on Nick's or Pinot from there. They talk about the changes and the choices that were made and the things that were left off.
Speaker 1 (6:10): Yeah. Yeah. Wrong decision. Wrong decision. Oh my god.
Speaker 1 (6:16): You basically took all of the creativity and decided not to use it and just tell a very bland, generic, every other episode of a comic book based TV show would do this kind of thing. So even having not, but hearing people who have read the source material, it would have made you more mad. And it also just but I think it's important to recognize that when do things that are are adopted, do they have to be, like, word for word exactly? No. Everybody understands what an adaptation is.
Speaker 1 (7:01): But you don't take it's almost as though you took the soul of a story and just sucked it out. And it's dumbed down. And I could go, I have not thought about this movie since watching it on Thursday evening because and this is nothing. The the only performance I thought was good and just and I thought was decent was Ali. And that was mainly because, and and I think if people don't like her performance, it's like, well, she wasn't given a lot.
Speaker 1 (7:44): Okay? At the end of the day, she was given play drunk. Okay. Do this. But she also wasn't given the best dialogue in the world either.
Speaker 1 (7:54): No. No. And just the character of Supergirl was also just not given a movie because No. This is really Ruthie's story. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (8:09): And I really don't like Ruthie. Ruthie just became so redundant. But they have to win with the stars. I don't wanna belabor this at all. But I think at the end of the day for me, I had no fun with this movie.
Speaker 1 (8:29): I just if I if people want to know my thoughts, it's it just that is the sum of it. I had no fun. I didn't laugh out loud at anything. Nothing was interesting to me. It was just blah.
Speaker 1 (8:45): Okay? Yeah. Now have I seen worse movies? Abso fucking lutely. But Yeah.
Unknown Speaker (8:52): Yeah. This is this is also, I think, people saying this is a good movie. I'm like, is it? Is it a good movie? I didn't even have fun.
Speaker 1 (9:02): I had more fun with Mando and Grogu. Okay? I don't know.
Speaker 2 (9:09): Yeah. Yeah. So I do have to ask you because we we've seen Lobo in another iteration live action, with the show Krypton, if you recall.
Speaker 1 (9:22): No. I I know what you're I know what you're setting up to ask me. I'm just waiting for you to ask me.
Unknown Speaker (9:28): Yeah. Yeah. So, I mean well, go ahead. Well clearly, I felt like I I I pre go folks, go if you wanna see a live action version of of of Lobo, what do you think?
Speaker 1 (9:42): Jason watch Triptown. And go and watch go if you wanna see a good Superman TV show, arguably a movie, go watch Krypton. Okay? Yeah. More people needed to watch that show.
Speaker 1 (9:58): We should have got a third and fourth season. My god. That story was just beginning. But, no, I I thought, again, it just fell flat. It it just looked like, oh my god.
Speaker 1 (10:11): There's Jason Momoa in makeup. Okay. Yeah. But but I also I don't necessarily know if that's because that was Jason Momoa or, again, what he was given to do and work with, it wasn't of any substance.
Unknown Speaker (10:30): Yeah.
Speaker 1 (10:31): So it's hard to, in a movie like this, to say like, oh, that didn't work or like the performance didn't work when when there's not a lot of substance across the board because they watered the fuck everything the fuck down. And they they like, everyone I've heard people say, well, the little stuff on Krypton actually worked. Then I'm like, did it? Because I thought it could have been even if if in present day, if we had more of a deeper connection to her, learning about Cara's past and that trauma she carries and that grief that she carries would have been so much more powerful. And yet the moments in the present day when she's trying to relate to Ruthie about grief and explain to her about her own trauma, it just was flat because And it there was a complete yeah.
Unknown Speaker (11:33): Go go ahead.
Unknown Speaker (11:34): No. I was gonna say, I mean, I don't know if for me, it fell flat because it just seemed contradictory at the end. I mean, with the the choice that they made. Which, you know, I wasn't you know, her with with Cara, Kelly, and Creme, fine. I I didn't have a problem with that.
Unknown Speaker (11:52): But
Speaker 1 (11:53): Can I spoil what happened in the actual comic book?
Unknown Speaker (11:57): Yeah. Go ahead.
Speaker 1 (11:59): Because k. This was, again, a decision they made, Will. So in the comic book, apparently, the panel ends exactly very similar to that moment in the movie where she takes the sword swings, right? Then they jump to future day because the whole book is written from a elderly Ruthie talking about this adventure she had with Supergirl. Okay.
Speaker 1 (12:30): And they're at the Fortress Of Solitude. Cara never killed him. They put him in this in the Fortress Of Solitude and were releasing him. So for them, it was probably, like, two decades had passed or three. Ruthie's an elderly woman now.
Speaker 1 (12:47): But for for him, it was eons. Right. Yeah. And he had he spent so much time in there that he got to self reflect and actually was a better but she never killed him. It was more about, like, him actually being reformed essentially in this prison that they put him in but that that was like arguably the biggest decision that they made not to go with the source material.
Unknown Speaker (13:20): Yeah. Yeah. I knew he was yeah. I did I did know that he was was placed in the Phantom Zone, and he, yeah, he did have that that that you know, rehabilitation. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (13:32): But, you know, but I yeah. And, you know, and guess that's the other thing too because I know they were you know, they added this human trafficking, sex trafficking element to the story, which is a very, you know, very you know, it's a very heavy, serious material. And I know they were trying to do it to add depth to the story. But again, just all the other things around surrounding it undercut what could have been a very groundbreaking suit, you know, movie in this genre. And to your point, whether, you know, you know, if they had stuck to that, I don't know, you know, and and really went deeper into that.
Speaker 2 (14:18): I think where I was going earlier too as far as the, the choice in the story that they were telling here where Cara does murder or does kill him. One, were just, you know, showing a differentiation between, you know, her and Clark in in this in this place. But, also, I just felt like it it undercut, You know, I guess when they go to the end of the film and she just decides Earth is now her home, she's all, you know, more light and and and all those kind of things, it just, you know, it just kinda it didn't match what she just told Ruthie about taking someone else's life. So, you know, so again, it was just a lot of just logical and just poor store, poor story choices. And, and, you know, and like you said, adaptations don't have to be one to one.
Speaker 2 (15:13): But if you're going to do an adaptation, know we were just, you know, we were talking this evening about House of the House of the Dragon, and we've talked about other adaptations and we know there's no, it's not a one to one. In both cases, we haven't read the source material. If you are going to change from the source material to tell your own story, at least make sure that it's internally consistent and logically consistent with the story that you're telling. And I just felt like this movie wasn't that.
Speaker 1 (15:44): The whole sex trafficking end of it all, to me, I took it as cliche. Oh, we have a female superhero so we're gonna put her up against a man who's in charge of this sex trafficking ring.
Unknown Speaker (16:00): Yeah.
Speaker 1 (16:01): Like, has like, did I'm sorry, but was, at one point in time, was Cara a slave? At one point in time, was Cara like, did Cara's friend end up as part of the like, she had no connection to that and that is why that did not work because a villain needs to needs to reflect something in the hero and she didn't he didn't reflect anything in terms of her or Ruthie, arguably.
Unknown Speaker (16:32): Yeah.
Speaker 1 (16:32): And what would be more interesting is this whole thing that they kind of brought up with Lobo about the annihilation of your own race and that devastation and the choice to do that when with Cara, her whole race, like, she had no choice. And she she was born into this kind of Band Aid to cover a bullet hole and then it just so happened. So they and I think that was the big disconnect is that again, the villains are so important in terms of these stories and it's so clear when the villain does not work because they are not reflecting anything back on our hero, the story itself fails. It doesn't matter if it's a if it's a heroine or a hero, it will fail regardless. And and to me, it's especially critical when it's like this is the first chapter.
Speaker 1 (17:41): Well, I felt like you kinda started in the middle of the story. And and so and you tried to squeeze in some origins, but it it didn't make any sense to why what was happening in present day because we've had extensive, talks about other things when flashbacks in present day, they have to have connective tissue as well, and and it's just it's poorly made. And it's Yeah. And it's a big disappointment. And people can say all the time, like, James Gunn didn't write it.
Speaker 1 (18:14): James Gunn didn't, didn't direct it. He's the head producer, so he made the decisions that put people in this in places to produce this product. So Yep. Yeah. Just like with Feige, if a Marvel movie doesn't do well, it's his fault.
Speaker 1 (18:31): Yep. It's still gonna be James Gunn's fault at the end of the day.
Unknown Speaker (18:34): Yep. The buck stops with the balls.
Speaker 1 (18:36): Yeah. Yeah. I mean Yeah. Watching this was like watching one of the episodes of Peacemaker season two I did not like. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (18:47): If not, a little worse because, again, there I did not I I just to sum it up, I I can't even say this is like a popcorn movie. No. Because I did not have fun at all with this movie. Did I loathe it like I loathed Ant Man in the quantum zone? No.
Unknown Speaker (19:11): That that awful.
Unknown Speaker (19:12): Yeah. That was that that one broke me for the MCU for a while. That one in Thor: Love and Thunder.
Unknown Speaker (19:18): Yeah. Yeah. So so I I think
Unknown Speaker (19:21): This not this is not a gender thing because that those two movies broke me. I was done with Sarah will tell you. I was done with the MCU for a bit for for that.
Unknown Speaker (19:29): Yeah. Meanwhile, I I had fun with Love and Thunder. I did not have fun with Quantum Zone. I think Will even had a little bit more fun than I did. I did not.
Speaker 1 (19:38): I had so many issues with that. But, but, yeah, that those are my super bowl thoughts.
Unknown Speaker (19:45): Yeah. Yeah. That I mean, those yeah. Yeah. I I don't have much more to add.
Unknown Speaker (19:50): I mean, I think we've we you know, at the end of the day, I I I really did enjoy Millie Alcock. I mean, she her casting, they they did they did a disservice to Millie. They did a disservice to Millie with this film.
Speaker 1 (20:05): Yep. Arguably to all the actors.
Unknown Speaker (20:08): Yeah. All the all the cast, really. All of them, really. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:11): Yeah. But on that note, Will, why don't you tell our listeners where they can find you?
Unknown Speaker (20:17): Yes. You can find me on all the socials at will m p w I l l m p o l k.
Speaker 1 (20:23): And you can find me there too at s j bellmont, s j b l m o n t. Please follow our crew on x, formerly known as Twitter at seen and nerd, on blue sky. Friend us on Facebook. Follow us on Instagram and threads at seen underscore n underscore n, and visit our website www.seenandnerdpodcast.com. But most importantly, rate, follow, and comment on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get podcasts.
Speaker 1 (20:45): Good night, geek out. You're welcome.
Unknown Speaker (21:10): New England summers don't exactly ease you in. One minute, the windows are open. The next, your apartment feels unbearable. Well, meet Windmill Air. Windmill window ACs are sleek.
Unknown Speaker (21:21): They're quiet, and cool your space fast without the bulky eyesore. Rated the number one easiest AC to install, Windmill lets you adjust temperatures right from your phone and unlike traditional units, cools your room more evenly like central air. Shop Windmill online at windmillair.com or pick up an AC at your nearest Target or Home Depot. Windmill, modern air care,
Unknown Speaker (21:43): your
Unknown Speaker (21:43): room deserves.


















































